The Research
Our work draws on several methodological approaches and theoretical traditions to answer fundamental questions about the nature and impact of punishment. Our research is very much a work in progress, and below we have summarized some of our main research areas.
International exchange
International exchanges between American and Scandinavian correctional professionals lie at the very heart of this intervention. A group of correctional officers and leaders from PA spent an extended period of time in Norway, Sweden and Denmark in the summer of 2019, where they visited several correctional facilities and got an opportunity to work alongside their Scandinavian peers. Following the unexpected delay to the project caused by the global COVID-19 pandemic, the group from PA returned to Sweden for a shorter, immersive experience in 2022. Their Scandinavian peers have also visited them at SCI Chester on several occasions.
Before, during and after these exchanges the research team collect both quantitative and qualitative data based on observations, interviews, focus groups, surveys and audio diaries to capture the first-hand experiences of the people involved. For instance, what do the officers and leaders from PA perceive as the most notable differences between Scandinavian corrections and American corrections? Which aspects of the Scandinavian environment – be it physical, practical, cultural and/or social – do they identify as viable “penal transplants”, and which aspects of the Scandinavian environment do they deem irrelevant or unsuited for the PA context? How do the PA team assess the prison climate of the Scandinavian institutions they spend time at, and how do they conceptualize the roles and responsibilities of COs in the various systems?
Reform development
The team from PA has been tasked with developing the reforms at SCI Chester. This has been - and continues to be - a very bottoms up approach, that is driven by the officers who have traveled to Scandinavia and now staff the Little Scandinavia Unit.
The research team …
Staff wellbeing
Among correctional staff in the United States, levels of stress, rates of PTSD, and challenges like depression, alcoholism, and domestic abuse are more common than among the general population (REF).
TBD
Prison climate
TBD
To measure prison climate at the individual, unit and facility level, we rely on a slightly adapted version of the Prison Climate Questionnaire developed by a team of researchers at Leiden University in the Netherlands.
Prison misconduct
TBD
Post-release outcomes
One of the main goals of punishment is to reduce reoffending, and a key goal of the Scandinavian Prison Project is, therefore, to assess whether serving time on the Little Scandinavia Unit has any appreciable impact on post-release behavior. However, given that we are still in the early stages of the project, too few people have been released from the unit to say anything certain about these outcomes. We expect to be able to provide results for recidivism by the end of 2025 at the earliest.
The Evaluation
One of the main goals of the Scandinavian Prison Project is to assess the impact of the Little Scandinavia Unit on both in-prison outcomes (such as prison climate and misconducts) and out-prison outcomes (such as reoffending). To be able to isolate the effect of the unit itself, it is essential that the people living on the unit are as similar as possible to the people we compare them and their behaviors to.
To achieve this, people are assigned to the unit based on a lottery system. Broadly speaking, people are eligible to move to the unit insofar as they:
Live on a so-called general population housing unit.
Don’t have a recent history of serious staff assault.
Don’t explicitly opt out.
People who meet these criteria all have an equal chance of being assigned to either the Little Scandinavia unit (the so-called “treatment group” in the evaluation) or stay at another General Population housing unit (the so-called “comparison group” in the evaluation) on the day of the lottery.
In addition to creating groups that are directly comparable, this process is arguably more fair than handpicking people given that it avoids preferential treatment by staff or management at the facility.
Publications
Chanenson, S. L., J. M. Hyatt & S. N. Andersen (in press). Embracing Dignity: Pennsylvania’s Experiment with Scandinavian Correctional Principles. In Eisen, L.-B. & W. J. Brennan (Eds.) Punitive Excess. New York: Columbia University Press.
Horowitz, V. L., E. R. Greberman, P. E. Nolan, J. M. Hyatt, C. Uggen, S. N. Andersen & S. L. Chanenson (2021). A Comparative Perspective on Officer Wellness: American Reflections from Norwegian Prisons. Criminal Justice Studies, 34(4): 477-497.
Hyatt, J. M., S. N. Andersen, S. L. Chanenson, V. Horowitz & C. Uggen (2021). «We Can Actually Do This”: Adapting Scandinavian Correctional Culture in Pennsylvania. American Criminal Law Review, 58(4): 1715-1746.
Hyatt, J. M., S. N. Andersen, V. Horowitz & H. G. N. Lopez (2023). Correctional Officers, the Carceral Environment and Reentry: Perspectives from the U.S. and Scandinavia. Advancing Corrections Journal, 15: 101-114.
Non-academic publications
Academic publications
Andersen, S. N. (2022). The Scandinavian prison project: What happens when Scandinavian correctional principles and practices travel to the US? NSfK blog post, May 19, 2022.
Chanenson, S. L., S. N. Andersen, J. M. Hyatt, A. Høidal, K. Eason & P. Connor-Council (2021). “Ice in the Stomach”: Reforming Prisons at Home and Abroad. Annotated Transcript. American Criminal Law Review, 58(4): 1755-1789.
Hyatt, J. M. & S. N. Andersen (2022). A Pennsylvania prison gets a Scandinavian-style makeover – and shows how the US penal system could become more humane. The Conversation, October 7, 2022.
Be part of the project
Do you want to take part in our research? Don’t hesitate to reach out!